Can tourism be considered successful if arrivals increase, but the local communities – the very soul of the destination – feel strained and excluded? Too often, tourism success is measured in arrivals, occupancy and revenue. These numbers matter. But they tell only a fraction of the story.
We must ask: who is this success really for? Traditional growth metrics are no longer sufficient to protect the residents who host the world or the workers who power the experience. To prevent cultural heritage from being reduced to mere photo spots, we must rethink what success means and prioritise people over spreadsheets.
When visitors begin to outnumber locals in the spaces they live, cities and people risk transitioning from living cultural ecosystems to visitor-oriented economies. In Kyoto, narrow streets are no longer pathways for residents; they have become photo corridors for visitors. Quiet neighbourhoods devolve into backdrops for social media posts, and it is increasingly common to see residents directing angry looks towards tourists as local frustration reaches a breaking point.
Overtourism creates physical pressure on infrastructure and the environment. Stress is put on water systems as transport networks and streets become overcrowded. Then there is the social pressure, especially in terms of rising frustration among local residents. Traditions dating back to the Edo period risk being reduced to superficial cultural performances staged solely for profit, stripped of their original value and depth. In this landscape, we must ask: where are the locals?
According to India’s Ministry of Tourism, in 2024 alone, the country recorded 2.9 billion domestic tourist visits, marking a 17.51 per cent increase from the previous year. Foreign tourist visits reached 20.57 million, up by more than 8.8 per cent from 2023.